Lesson 7: The Influence of Worldview on Society

Introduction 

In today’s interconnected world, worldviews play a crucial role in shaping the decisions, policies, and interactions of societies. A worldview can be understood as the lens through which individuals and groups perceive the world around them. It encompasses a set of values, beliefs, and assumptions that guide how we interpret reality, influence our actions, and dictate how societies function. This lesson will build on prior knowledge to explore how differing worldviews actively shape societal decisions, from governance to environmental stewardship, and how they can lead to both conflict and cooperation.

Previously, we’ve learned that worldviews are influenced by many factors, including culture, religion, geography, and history​​. These factors combine to create distinct perspectives on life, politics, economics, and the environment. Understanding these perspectives is crucial for navigating today’s globalized society, where different worldviews frequently interact and sometimes clash. Societal values on topics such as governance, justice, environmental policies, and economic systems are often direct expressions of a dominant worldview, shaping everything from individual choices to international diplomacy.

This handout will focus on real-world applications of worldviews in modern societies. We will examine case studies from various countries, including Canada, and explore how Indigenous worldviews, as well as other global perspectives, influence governance, law, environmental policies, and even international conflict resolution. Understanding how worldviews shape societal decisions and behaviors will give students a clearer insight into the complexities of today’s world and help foster empathy and cooperation in diverse settings.

Worldviews and Decision-Making in Modern Society

Worldviews are not just abstract concepts; they have tangible impacts on the decisions societies make in various aspects of life, including governance, legal systems, and policy development. The choices that governments, institutions, and even individuals make are often influenced by deeply embedded cultural, religious, and philosophical worldviews. In this section, we will examine how worldviews shape governance and legal systems, comparing different countries and societies, and explore specific case studies to highlight these influences in action.

Worldviews and Governance

Governance—the way societies organize power, authority, and decision-making—is profoundly influenced by worldview. Different worldviews inform what societies believe is the "best" way to structure government, distribute power, and create laws. This can be seen when comparing democratic, authoritarian, and theocratic governance models across the world.

In democratic societies like Canada, the worldview that underpins governance is largely influenced by values of individual rights, freedom, and equality. These principles stem from Western Enlightenment ideals, which emphasize human dignity, liberty, and the belief that all individuals should have a voice in how they are governed. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, for example, guarantees fundamental rights such as freedom of expression, equality before the law, and protection against discrimination. This reflects a worldview that values individual autonomy and fairness​. Canada's embrace of multiculturalism is another product of its worldview, encouraging the coexistence of multiple cultures under a shared commitment to democracy and human rights.

In contrast, in China, governance is heavily influenced by a Confucian worldview that values social harmony, collective responsibility, and respect for hierarchy. While China operates under a single-party system, the Confucian philosophy, with its focus on order, respect for authority, and collective welfare, shapes both government policies and social expectations. The idea of guanxi (personal networks or connections) plays a significant role in how business and politics are conducted, reflecting the importance of relationships and social obligations​.

A theocratic model of governance, such as that in Iran, illustrates how religious worldviews can directly shape a country’s laws and policies. Iran's political system is based on Islamic principles, where the supreme leader holds significant power, and laws are derived from Sharia, or Islamic law. This worldview prioritizes adherence to religious doctrine and the idea that societal laws should align with religious beliefs, shaping everything from education to personal freedoms.

The differences between these governance systems demonstrate how worldviews are foundational in determining what a society values and how it organizes its political structures. Whether prioritizing individual rights, collective harmony, or religious adherence, governance systems are a reflection of the dominant worldview within a society.

Worldviews and Legal Systems

Just as governance is influenced by worldview, so too are legal systems. Laws represent the codified values and beliefs of a society, and different worldviews result in vastly different approaches to justice and law.

In Canada, the legal system is based on a Western legal tradition that values individual rights, equality before the law, and impartiality. Rooted in English common law and influenced by Enlightenment ideals, Canada's legal framework aims to protect the rights of individuals while ensuring fairness. However, Canada’s legal system is also increasingly incorporating Indigenous legal principles, reflecting a shift towards a more pluralistic understanding of justice. For instance, the practice of restorative justice, which focuses on reconciliation and repairing harm rather than punishment, is rooted in Indigenous worldviews and is gaining prominence within Canadian legal circles​. This is evident in programs that prioritize community-based solutions and healing over incarceration, especially in Indigenous communities, where traditional concepts of justice emphasize balance, restoration, and collective well-being​.

On the other hand, legal systems in countries like Saudi Arabia are heavily influenced by Islamic worldviews, specifically Sharia law, which governs both public and private behavior. Sharia law is derived from the Quran and Hadith, and it covers not only criminal and civil matters but also personal conduct, such as dress codes and religious practices. In this system, justice is closely intertwined with religious doctrine, and legal decisions are often based on interpretations of religious texts. This worldview emphasizes the importance of maintaining moral order and religious purity within society, reflecting a holistic integration of religious and legal principles.

In Western countries, the legal system typically separates religion from law. However, in countries with theocratic or religious legal systems, the worldview that prioritizes religious adherence results in a different understanding of justice and law, often focusing more on moral compliance than on secular human rights.

Case Study: Canada’s Integration of Indigenous and Western Legal Systems

In recent years, Canada has made significant efforts to incorporate Indigenous worldviews into its legal and governance systems. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), established in 2008, was a pivotal moment in this process, aimed at addressing the harms caused by the residential school system and working towards healing relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples in Canada. One of the key recommendations of the TRC was the integration of Indigenous legal traditions into the broader Canadian legal framework.

Indigenous worldviews, particularly those related to justice, are often centered around concepts of restoration, balance, and community well-being. This contrasts with Western legal systems, which have traditionally emphasized punishment and retribution. In Indigenous communities, justice is not just about punishing the wrongdoer but about restoring harmony within the community. For example, in many Indigenous legal traditions, conflicts are resolved through consensus-building, dialogue, and the involvement of community members, rather than through adversarial court proceedings​​.

This integration is most evident in the growing use of restorative justice programs in Canada. These programs aim to bring together victims, offenders, and community members to collectively resolve issues, often through dialogue and reconciliation. This approach reflects an Indigenous worldview that values healing and the reintegration of offenders into society, rather than isolating them through imprisonment. By incorporating these Indigenous principles, Canada’s legal system is evolving to become more inclusive of different worldviews, fostering greater cultural understanding and respect.

Worldview, Governance, and Policy-Making: A Global Comparison

The differences in worldview also extend to policy-making, particularly in areas such as environmental protection and social welfare. Countries that embrace Indigenous worldviews, for instance, tend to adopt policies that reflect a deep respect for the environment and a focus on sustainability. This can be seen in New Zealand, where the Maori worldview has significantly influenced environmental policy. In 2017, New Zealand granted legal personhood to the Whanganui River, recognizing the river as an ancestor to the Maori people. This decision, rooted in the Maori worldview of interconnectedness with nature, reflects a growing recognition of Indigenous perspectives in governance​.

In contrast, capitalist societies driven by Western worldviews often prioritize economic growth over environmental sustainability. In these societies, policy decisions are frequently made with the goal of maximizing profit and development, sometimes at the expense of environmental protection. This worldview sees humans as separate from nature, with the right to exploit resources for economic gain. However, the rise of global environmental movements has started to challenge this worldview, pushing for policies that prioritize sustainability, biodiversity, and the long-term health of the planet.

This global comparison highlights the importance of worldview in shaping policy-making, whether it’s in governance, law, or environmental sustainability. Understanding these differences is crucial for navigating international relations and addressing global challenges such as climate change, which require cooperation across differing worldviews.

Worldviews in Economic and Environmental Policies

The choices societies make regarding their economies and environmental stewardship are deeply influenced by the underlying worldviews that shape their values, priorities, and attitudes. These worldviews determine how societies understand wealth, resource distribution, and the relationship between humanity and nature. In this section, we will explore how different worldviews have shaped economic systems and environmental policies, focusing on the contrast between capitalist, socialist, and Indigenous perspectives.

Economic Systems and Worldviews

Economic systems—whether capitalist, socialist, or based on Indigenous worldviews—are driven by the values and beliefs that a society holds about wealth, labor, and the distribution of resources. Each system reflects a different way of understanding human relationships with money, work, and social responsibility.

Capitalism is a worldview rooted in individualism and the belief that private ownership and free markets are the best mechanisms for driving economic growth and prosperity. In capitalist societies, such as the United States or most Western nations, the economy is structured around competition and the idea that individuals should be free to pursue wealth and personal success. This worldview places a high value on personal initiative, innovation, and the accumulation of wealth. Capitalist economies often prioritize economic freedom over social welfare, resulting in significant wealth inequalities but also driving technological innovation and economic growth.

In contrast, socialism is grounded in the worldview of collective responsibility and equality. Socialist economies prioritize the redistribution of resources to ensure that everyone’s basic needs are met, reflecting a belief that the economy should serve the collective good rather than individual profit. Countries like Sweden and Norway incorporate socialist principles into their economies through extensive welfare programs, high taxation, and public ownership of key industries, such as healthcare and education. The worldview that underpins socialism is focused on reducing inequality and promoting social cohesion by ensuring that wealth is shared more equally among all members of society.

Indigenous worldviews offer a distinct approach to economics, one that is often based on communal ownership, sustainability, and reciprocity. In many Indigenous cultures, wealth is not measured by individual accumulation but by the health and prosperity of the entire community. Resources, including land and natural resources, are viewed as gifts to be shared and preserved for future generations. This worldview emphasizes balance and sustainability, focusing on meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to thrive. In Canada, Indigenous economic systems historically revolved around the sharing of resources within and between communities, with practices that prioritized long-term stewardship of the land​.

One example of this Indigenous worldview in practice is the potlatch ceremony, a traditional gift-giving event among Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest. Rather than accumulating wealth, the host of a potlatch distributes goods and resources to the community, emphasizing generosity, reciprocity, and social ties. This practice reflects an economic system built on relationships and community well-being, rather than competition and individual gain.

These different worldviews shape how societies structure their economies, whether through capitalist competition, socialist redistribution, or Indigenous sharing and stewardship. Each system reflects different values about wealth, fairness, and responsibility, with significant implications for how resources are managed and distributed.

Worldviews and Environmental Stewardship

The way societies view and interact with the environment is also closely tied to their worldview. Environmental policies, from conservation efforts to climate change mitigation, are shaped by beliefs about humanity’s relationship to nature. Understanding the worldview behind these policies can help explain why different societies take such different approaches to environmental protection.

Capitalist Worldview and Environmental Exploitation

In capitalist societies, the environment is often viewed as a resource to be exploited for economic gain. This worldview assumes that humans are separate from nature and that natural resources exist primarily for human use. The emphasis on economic growth and profit maximization in capitalist economies often leads to the extraction of natural resources with little regard for long-term environmental sustainability. This has resulted in significant environmental degradation, including deforestation, pollution, and the depletion of natural resources.

One of the key critiques of the capitalist worldview is that it tends to prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term environmental health. For example, the fossil fuel industry, which plays a dominant role in capitalist economies, has been a major contributor to climate change due to its reliance on carbon-intensive energy sources. In many cases, environmental regulations are seen as obstacles to economic growth, leading to conflicts between environmentalists and industries that depend on resource extraction.

However, capitalist societies are beginning to grapple with the environmental consequences of unchecked growth. The rise of the environmental movement in the late 20th century has led to increased awareness of the need for sustainability. While capitalism traditionally emphasized exploitation, there is now growing interest in green capitalism, which seeks to balance economic growth with environmental protection by promoting renewable energy, eco-friendly technologies, and corporate social responsibility.

Indigenous Worldviews and Sustainability

In contrast, many Indigenous worldviews are deeply rooted in the belief that humans are part of the natural world, not separate from it. This worldview emphasizes respect for the environment and the need to live in harmony with nature. Indigenous peoples around the world have long practiced sustainable land management, guided by the belief that the earth is a living entity that must be cared for and respected.

In Canada, the Seven Generations Principle is a core tenet of many Indigenous communities. This principle holds that decisions should be made with consideration for how they will impact the next seven generations, ensuring that the actions taken today do not harm the environment or the community in the long term. This worldview contrasts sharply with capitalist models that prioritize immediate profit and growth​.

A powerful example of how Indigenous worldviews shape environmental policy can be seen in the recognition of Indigenous land rights and the role of Indigenous knowledge in conservation efforts. Indigenous peoples in Canada have been at the forefront of environmental protection, advocating for the preservation of forests, rivers, and wildlife. This is evident in movements such as the resistance to pipeline construction on Indigenous lands, where Indigenous communities argue that the environmental risks of such projects outweigh the potential economic benefits. Their stance reflects a worldview that places the health of the land and future generations above short-term economic interests.

Global Environmental Policies and Shared Worldviews

Globally, there is increasing recognition that the dominant worldviews of industrialized societies need to adapt in order to address environmental challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and resource depletion. International agreements like the Paris Agreement on climate change represent a convergence of worldviews, where nations with different economic systems and environmental policies come together to address a shared global problem. The Paris Agreement reflects a growing consensus that sustainability must be a priority for all nations, regardless of their underlying worldview​.

However, even within international frameworks, conflicts between worldviews persist. Some countries, particularly those with strong capitalist economies, continue to resist stringent environmental regulations, arguing that they hinder economic growth. In contrast, countries and communities influenced by Indigenous or socialist worldviews are often more willing to adopt ambitious environmental policies, viewing sustainability as an integral part of their social and cultural responsibility.

Incorporating Indigenous perspectives into environmental policy-making is becoming more common, particularly in countries like Canada and New Zealand, where Indigenous communities have legal and cultural rights to their lands. In these contexts, Indigenous worldviews offer a powerful counter-narrative to the extractive, profit-driven models of capitalism, emphasizing the importance of balance, reciprocity, and respect for the natural world.

Conflicts Arising from Differing Worldviews

Conflicts often arise when societies with distinct worldviews come into contact, leading to tensions over values, resources, and political power. Whether at the national or global level, clashes between worldviews can manifest in cultural, religious, and ideological struggles. These conflicts have shaped much of human history, from wars over territory to ideological battles between competing economic systems. In this section, we will explore how differing worldviews have contributed to major historical and contemporary conflicts, examine cases of worldview-based cooperation, and reflect on how societies have adapted or resolved these conflicts over time.

Global Conflicts: Worldviews in Political and Ideological Struggles

One of the most significant examples of a worldview clash is the Cold War (1947–1991), a period of geopolitical tension between the capitalist United States and its allies, and the communist Soviet Union. The conflict was not fought directly on the battlefield, but rather through proxy wars, political pressure, and economic competition. At its core, the Cold War was a struggle between two fundamentally different worldviews: the Western capitalist worldview, which values free markets, individual rights, and democratic governance, and the Soviet communist worldview, which prioritized collective ownership, state control, and equality over freedom.

The capitalist worldview, as represented by the U.S. and Western Europe, held that economic prosperity and individual freedom were best achieved through free markets and limited government intervention. This worldview was rooted in Enlightenment ideals of personal liberty and self-determination, which had been central to the development of Western political systems. In contrast, the Soviet Union’s communist worldview, based on the ideas of Karl Marx, emphasized the role of the state in redistributing wealth and controlling the economy to achieve greater social and economic equality. Communism rejected capitalism’s focus on individual gain, viewing it as inherently exploitative and unjust.

The Cold War was driven by the belief that these two worldviews could not coexist peacefully. Both sides viewed the spread of the other’s ideology as a direct threat to their own way of life. This led to numerous conflicts, from the Korean War to the Vietnam War, where both superpowers supported opposing factions based on their alignment with capitalist or communist ideologies. The nuclear arms race, another hallmark of the Cold War, was fueled by the mutual distrust and ideological opposition between these two worldviews, as each superpower sought to deter the other through the threat of massive retaliation.

While the Cold War ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the ideological divide between capitalism and socialism continues to influence global politics today. Countries such as China and Cuba still maintain socialist or communist systems, while most of the world has adopted variations of the capitalist model. However, the global rise of economic inequality, environmental degradation, and political unrest has led to renewed interest in socialist ideas, particularly among younger generations in Western countries.

Religious and Cultural Conflicts: Secularism vs. Religious Worldviews

Religious worldviews have also been a major source of conflict throughout history. In many cases, religious beliefs shape not only personal behavior but also societal norms, laws, and governance structures. Conflicts often arise when secular and religious worldviews collide, particularly in multicultural or pluralistic societies.

One contemporary example of this is the ongoing debate over secularism and religious expression in France. France, a country with a strong secular tradition rooted in the principles of the French Revolution, has struggled with the challenge of integrating its growing Muslim population while maintaining its commitment to secularism. This tension has manifested in policies such as the ban on wearing religious symbols, including the Islamic headscarf (hijab), in public schools and government buildings. The French government argues that these policies are necessary to preserve secularism and ensure the separation of religion from public life. However, many Muslims view these policies as discriminatory, arguing that they infringe on their religious freedom and contribute to social exclusion.

This conflict between secular and religious worldviews reflects deeper differences in how individuals and societies understand the role of religion in public life. In a secular worldview, religion is seen as a private matter that should not influence government or public institutions. Secularism promotes the idea that the state should remain neutral in matters of religion, ensuring that no single religion dominates public life. In contrast, many religious worldviews hold that faith is an integral part of one’s identity and should be expressed in all aspects of life, including the public sphere. For observant Muslims in France, wearing the hijab is not merely a personal choice but a religious obligation, making the ban on religious symbols particularly contentious.

Similar conflicts have played out in other countries, particularly in the context of religious minorities. For example, in India, tensions between the Hindu majority and the Muslim minority have escalated in recent years, driven by the rise of Hindu nationalism. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) promotes a Hindu nationalist worldview that emphasizes India’s identity as a Hindu nation, leading to increased marginalization and violence against Muslims. These religious conflicts, while rooted in historical tensions, are often exacerbated by political leaders who use religious identity as a tool to consolidate power and promote a specific worldview.

Worldview Conflicts in the Environmental Arena

Worldviews also play a significant role in environmental conflicts, particularly as societies grapple with the challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation. Differing worldviews on the relationship between humans and the environment have led to conflicts over resource extraction, land use, and environmental policy.

One of the most prominent examples of environmental conflict is the debate over pipeline construction in Canada, particularly the opposition to projects like the Keystone XL and Trans Mountain pipelines by Indigenous communities and environmental activists. For many Indigenous peoples in Canada, the land is not merely a resource to be exploited for economic gain but a sacred entity that must be protected and respected. This worldview is deeply rooted in Indigenous spirituality and traditional knowledge, which emphasize the interconnectedness of all living things and the need to preserve the environment for future generations.

In contrast, proponents of pipeline projects often operate within a capitalist worldview that prioritizes economic growth and energy security. They argue that pipelines are necessary to transport oil efficiently, create jobs, and stimulate economic development. This worldview sees natural resources as commodities to be extracted and utilized for human benefit, with less emphasis on long-term environmental sustainability. The conflict over pipeline construction reflects these fundamentally different perspectives on the environment and the role of economic development in society.

While the legal and political battles over pipelines continue, there are efforts to bridge these worldview gaps through negotiation and collaboration. Some Indigenous communities have partnered with energy companies to develop sustainable energy projects that respect both economic and environmental concerns. These partnerships reflect an emerging recognition that addressing environmental challenges requires incorporating multiple worldviews, including those that prioritize sustainability and stewardship over exploitation.

Cooperation and Adaptation: Addressing Shared Global Challenges

While conflicts between worldviews are common, there are also numerous examples of societies finding ways to cooperate and adapt to differing perspectives. One of the most pressing areas where this cooperation is essential is in addressing climate change. Climate change represents a global challenge that transcends national boundaries and requires collective action, even among countries with vastly different worldviews.

The Paris Agreement on climate change, signed in 2015, is an example of how diverse worldviews can converge around a shared goal. The agreement brought together nearly every country in the world to commit to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and limiting global warming to below 2°C. Despite differences in political systems, economic models, and cultural values, countries with competing worldviews recognized the need for global cooperation to address the existential threat posed by climate change.

However, even within this framework, conflicts persist. For instance, developing countries argue that they should not bear the same responsibility for reducing emissions as developed nations, given that the latter have historically contributed more to greenhouse gas emissions. This reflects a conflict between worldviews centered on historical responsibility and fairness. Developing nations, often operating within worldviews that emphasize communal responsibility and equitable development, argue that wealthier nations should take the lead in combating climate change, while they focus on economic growth and poverty reduction.

At the same time, indigenous communities around the world are advocating for greater inclusion of traditional ecological knowledge in climate solutions. Indigenous worldviews, which emphasize the importance of living in harmony with nature, offer valuable insights into sustainable land and resource management. In Canada, Indigenous groups have been at the forefront of advocating for climate action, using their traditional knowledge to inform environmental policies and push for a more sustainable approach to development.

Adaptation and Resolution: Learning from Worldview Conflicts

While conflicts driven by differing worldviews are often destructive, history shows that societies can also learn, adapt, and find ways to integrate diverse perspectives. In some cases, this involves creating spaces where multiple worldviews can coexist. For example, in modern Canada, the process of reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples involves recognizing and respecting the different worldviews that shape each group’s understanding of land, governance, and justice. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission has called for greater recognition of Indigenous rights and worldviews, particularly in areas such as education, governance, and environmental stewardship.

In other cases, conflict resolution requires finding common ground or developing hybrid systems that draw on the strengths of multiple worldviews. For instance, in the area of restorative justice, many countries are incorporating Indigenous principles of reconciliation and healing into their legal systems. This approach reflects a blending of worldviews, where Western legal traditions focused on punishment are complemented by Indigenous practices that prioritize restoration and community well-being.

In conclusion, while conflicts between worldviews can be deeply divisive, they also offer opportunities for societies to reflect, adapt, and find ways to integrate diverse perspectives. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, the ability to navigate and resolve worldview conflicts will be essential for creating more just, equitable, and sustainable societies.

Videos